Pipe Pigging Or Jetting: Which Is Best For Pipeline Upkeep?
Modern industries depend heavily on complex networks of pipelines to transport essential resources, forming the backbone of operations and global economies alike. Much like the veins and arteries in our bodies, these vital conduits require diligent care and maintenance to ensure their efficiency and longevity. Neglecting this upkeep can lead to costly inefficiencies, operational disruptions, and even environmental hazards.
Pipeline cleaning is important when it comes to effective maintenance, vital for maintaining optimal flow, preventing blockages, and extending infrastructure lifespan. Two of the most popular cleaning methods – foam pigging and jetting – each brings unique strengths to the table. We look into both techniques below, exploring their benefits, ideal applications, and the factors that distinguish them, helping you choose the right method for your needs.
What is pipe pigging?
Pipe pigging is a specialised technique for pipeline cleaning that takes its name from the tools it employs – foam pigs. These tools are inserted into pipelines and propelled through the system to clear debris, sediments, and residues. Pigging is a versatile method that serves not only as a means for routine cleaning but also as a tool for product recovery. The latter application involves reclaiming residual liquids from pipelines, reducing waste, increasing production efficiency, and improving overall yield – all of which are critical factors in manufacturing and industrial processes.
High-quality foam pigs are cylindrical cleaning devices crafted primarily from polyurethane foam. Their soft, flexible structure allows them to compress for easy insertion into pipelines and then expand to create a tight seal, ensuring effective cleaning across the pipe’s inner surface. The foam’s natural porosity further enhances its adaptability, allowing it to navigate bends, inclines, and varying pipe diameters with ease.
How does pipe pigging work?
At its core, a pigging system involves a solid projectile or plug known as a “pig”, as mentioned earlier, which is designed to fit snugly within a pipeline or tubing. The pig typically has a diameter slightly larger than the pipeline it is cleaning or maintaining. It is introduced into the pipeline, either manually or through an automated process, and then propelled through the system. This movement is facilitated by pig launchers and receivers, which house and return the pigs efficiently.
During cleaning, the pig scrapes away accumulated debris, sediment, and other contaminants that, if left unchecked, could corrode or damage the pipeline. For product recovery, pigging collects residual liquid within the pipeline, which can then be processed to minimise waste and maximise efficiency.
What is jetting?
Jetting, often referred to as hydrojetting, is a high-pressure cleaning method that uses a powerful stream of water to clear blockages, buildup, and debris from pipelines. This technique is particularly effective for addressing stubborn obstructions like hardened deposits or grease. However, it requires careful application, especially when dealing with delicate or ageing pipelines, to avoid potential damage.
How does jetting work?
The hydrojetting process uses equipment called a jetter, which comprises a water tank, a Teflon hose, a nozzle, and a high-pressure pump. This pump pressurises the water, enabling it to shoot out of the nozzle with incredible force. The nozzle, available in various shapes and sizes, is chosen based on the pipeline dimensions and the nature of the clog.
Before beginning the jetting process, technicians often conduct a video inspection by inserting a small borescope snake camera into the pipeline. This step provides a clear view of the blockage and its composition, allowing for a more targeted cleaning approach. Once the inspection is complete, the nozzle is inserted into the pipe, and the high-pressure water blast is released. Water pressurised up to 3,500 psi travels through the hose and exits the nozzle at tremendous speeds, forcefully dislodging clogs and flushing out accumulated debris.
When to choose between foam pigging and jetting
Selecting the appropriate pipeline cleaning method depends on specific operational requirements, pipeline conditions, and the nature of the obstructions present. Here’s a detailed comparison to guide your decision:
Foam pigging:
Advantages:
- Effective for long pipelines: Foam pigging is well-suited for cleaning extensive pipeline networks, and efficiently removing debris over long distances.
- Gentle on older or delicate pipelines: The flexible nature of foam pigs minimises the risk of damage, making this method ideal for pipelines that are older or constructed from materials susceptible to harm.
- Adaptability to pipeline geometry: Foam pigs can navigate bends, diameter variations, and complex pipeline configurations, ensuring comprehensive cleaning even in intricate systems.
Disadvantages:
- Limited efficacy on hard deposits: While effective against soft debris and general buildup, foam pigging may struggle to remove hardened deposits or severe blockages, potentially necessitating additional cleaning methods.
- Potential need for multiple passes: Achieving thorough cleaning might require several pigging runs, which can increase operational time and costs.
Hydro jetting:
Advantages:
- High effectiveness on stubborn blockages: Hydro jetting employs high-pressure water jets capable of dislodging and flushing out hardened deposits, grease, and mineral scales that other methods might not effectively address.
- Chemical-free cleaning: This method relies solely on water, eliminating the need for harsh chemicals and reducing environmental impact.
Disadvantages:
- Requirement for pipeline drainage: Prior to hydrojetting, pipelines must be thoroughly drained, adding preparation time and complexity to the cleaning process.
- High water consumption: The process demands substantial water usage, which can be a consideration in areas with water scarcity or where disposal of large volumes of wastewater poses challenges.
- Limited reach in extensive pipelines: Hydro jetting may be less effective for cleaning long pipeline sections due to pressure loss over distance, potentially requiring multiple access points or segmental cleaning approaches.
Conclusion
Maintaining pipeline efficiency and longevity is crucial for ensuring uninterrupted operations involving pipeline systems. Both foam pigging and hydro jetting offer effective solutions, each with its unique advantages and ideal applications. Hence, it is essential to understand the strengths and limitations of each method so you can make an informed choice tailored to your pipeline’s specific needs and ensure optimal performance and cost-efficiency.
If you’re in the market for cutting-edge engineering solutions for your projects, Pharmchem Engineering is the trusted partner you can rely on for all your off-the-shelf and custom parts requirements. From anti-vibration mounts to dry disconnect couplings and beyond, we deliver precision-engineered products that are 100% tested and customisable to your unique needs. Contact us today and experience the difference that excellence and reliability can make in your workplace.